Archived Seat Projections
- January Polls Place Conservatives on Cusp of Majority
2013-01-30 - Liberals Make Some Gains
2012-11-29 - Seat Redistribution Benefits the Conservatives
2012-10-10 - Federal Voting Patterns Stable
2012-08-22 - NDP Honeymoon Persists
2012-05-18 - NDP Gains in Wake of Mulcair Victory
2012-05-03 - Conservatives Continue to Slide
2012-03-27 - Conservatives Slide in Ontario, NDP Down in Quebec
2012-01-30 - Post Mortem 2011
2011-10-07 - Final 2011 projection
2011-05-01 - NDP still climbing in Quebec
2011-04-27 - Tsunami in Quebec
2011-04-22 - Conservatives gravitating towards 2008 results
2011-04-20 - Conservatives Recover Marginally
2011-04-15 - Something Stirring in Quebec?
2011-04-11 - Conservative Minority Holds Steady
2011-04-08 - Liberals Cutting into Harper Majority
2011-04-06 - Conservatives Slip Out of Majority Range
2011-03-31 - New Polls Project Harper Majority
2011-03-28 - Final Projection Prior to 2008 Election
Conservatives Continue to Receive High Support
The following projection is based upon a blending of weighted polls from Ekos, Ipsos-Reid and Harris-Decima conducted between Feb. 3 and Feb. 13. the aggregate sample was approximately 5700. In the key province of Ontario it showed a Conservative lead over the Liberals of 9.5%, as compared to 5.5% in the 2008 election.
Projected distribution of seats by party and region, released February 18, 2011
 |
 |
 |
 |
Other |
|
| Canada | 151 |
73 |
31 |
53 |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 143 |
77 |
37 |
49 |
2 |
| Atlantic provinces | 14 |
14 |
4 |
-- |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 10 |
17 |
4 |
-- |
1 |
| Quebec | 9 |
12 |
1 |
53 |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 10 |
14 |
1 |
49 |
1 |
| Ontario | 57 |
34 |
15 |
-- |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 51 |
38 |
17 |
-- |
-- |
| Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and territories | 23 |
5 |
3 |
-- |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 23 |
5 |
3 |
-- |
-- |
| Alberta | 28 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 27 |
-- |
1 |
-- |
-- |
| British Columbia | 20 |
8 |
8 |
-- |
-- |
| 2008 Election Results | 22 |
5 |
9 |
-- |
-- |
Note:
The "regional swing model" is more fully explained in a paper originally prepared and presented by Dr. Barry Kay to the 1990 annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, entitled "Improving Upon the Cube Law: A Regional Swing Model for Converting Canadian Popular Vote into Parliamentary Seats". It should be noted that the application of the model above does not make use of the "incumbency effect" described in that paper. In tests for past elections, using late campaign polls to project electoral outcomes, the model has proved to be accurate within an average of four seats per party since 1963. Readers interested in post-dictions for past federal elections dating back to 1963, for projections using pre-election polls dating back to the 1980 federal election and for three Ontario provincial elections, may contact me at bkay@wlu.ca.